“Although inclusion is indispensable, exclusion is
never total. Sometimes, people force their way into public forums and agendas.”
Robert Asen, 346
So far I’ve been
thinking about public discourse in terms of texts and the speeches, newscasts,
and other texts surrounding those. But what about music—isn’t music involved in the discourse as well?
Music has
historically been a means for people to communicate and/or make political and
social statements—just check out Shostakovich’s protest against Stalin’s regime
(such a huge statement even without the aid of lyrics!). If we move a little closer to home, however, we find past music publics that
exemplified what Asen discusses regarding collective imagination and
representation.
Consider the
minstrel songs from the 1830s; when white musicians
heard the work songs of plantation slaves, they returned north, painted their
faces black with cork (a kind of shoe polish), and performed shows meant to
mock African Americans. Asen states that “representation historically has meant
both standing for something absent and making something present” (355); through
a visual and lyrical discourse, the minstrels represented (inaccurately) a
people physically absent from the shows.
Now, Asen asserts that collective imagining
entails “social dialogue [which] enables the formation of opinions that did not
exist prior to discursive engagement” (349). The white popular collective
imagining of African Americans was turned upside down when confronted with
black social/musical “dialogue”:
Most folks in
the north had never heard Black music performed by Black musicians. That would
change and have dramatic effect when the Fisk University Jubilee Singers performed in the northern United States in
1867 and then on formal tour with just nine singers in 1871. While people were
at first angered that the music wasn’t “minstrel show” style but rather
profoundly moving concert music, the impact of actual Black music performed by
Black musicians would change everything. (Funk 34)
Not only did
black musicians “force their way into public [music] forums,” but they did so
with profound effect. White music publics realized that this “new” music was
actually quite sophisticated and enjoyable. In fact, Scott Joplin’s ragtimepiano music was a hit in most households across the
country, especially after the Stock Market Crash of 1908. Both sheet music and
records of the rags were available for purchase. Musicians in military bands even
transcribed Joplin’s music into band arrangements (Funk 35).
Interestingly
enough, even within the developing jazz scene, the counterpublic of women
musicians was still barred from “manly” instruments like trumpet and clarinet
and encouraged only to pursue vocals or piano. Hmm—could there be
counterpublics to counterpublics? At any rate, it wasn’t until WWII when
all-female swing bands swept the country and wrestled with “seeking to advance
self-fashioned interpretations of their interests and needs against
interpretations imposed by others” (Asen 346). (Perhaps I’ll post more on this
later).
The question at
the forefront of my mind while reading Asen was, “How do you change people’s
minds?” In response to that question, I think Asen would once again emphasize
the importance of inclusiveness within publics—even if that inclusiveness was
forced from the outside.
Sources:
Asen, Robert.
"Imagining in the Public Sphere." Philosophy and Rhetoric 35.4
(2002): 345-67.
Funk, Eric. Sound
Thinking: It's ALL Music--How Music Connects With Everything. Kendall Hunt
Pub, 2015. Web.
Sadie,
ReplyDeleteGreat questions and discussion. I took Eric Funk's Popular Music class, and was fascinated and impressed with how much music had to do with the Civil rights movement and working towards racial equality.
Music is an intriguing medium when considering discourse, because it seems its messages are often more subtle or encoded than overt public speeches, news articles, etc. Further, music can spread within pre-existing social arenas that might otherwise be distanced from other forms of public communication (i.e., no one sits in Bar IX and reads the newspaper). Also, music's influence can spread beyond its original circle, as different authors cover and sample songs for their own pieces. Much like quoting another text, music can enter the realm of intertextuality; although again, less overt than directly quoting an author.
But what does music allow that written text *doesn't?* Perhaps a stronger pathetic appeal? My mind keeps returning to the peace movements and the corresponding music that characterized the 1960s. Those songs unified groups and acted as battle cries for publics advocating for peace. I wonder if music is a more inclusive discourse, because its hearers needn't be experts to understand its meaning and feel the messages it's trying to convey. Unlike a piece of writing with specific terms or rhetorical style that a reader may struggle to understand and fully appreciate, music impresses on the senses and emotion much differently than words. Would this ease-of-access make it a potentially effective tool for counterpublics, whose members are often excluded or distant from contemporary styles of writing/argument?
All these interesting thoughts...thanks for writing. (:
Anjeli
Sadie,
ReplyDeleteThis is a great post! I think it plays off of a topic that we've only begun to touch on in class: the idea that an object itself is creating a kind of discourse (in this case, music). I was especially struck by your question of whether counterpublics can exist within counterpublics. I think in your example of women musicians emerging within the jazz scene that yes, of course counter-counterpublics can emerge. However, depending on the context, I think it's important to recognize when there is simply dissent and conflict that exists between members of a counterpublic, and when those dissenting members begin to pay attention to the issues that are arising and create discourse about those issues as a group. (Does that make sense?) I think a lot of different factors play into your question, such as the size of the public and the issues that constitute the public, but this is definitely a question that I want to keep wrestling with! Thanks for a fascinating look back into the history of music-- I'm interested to see what music is emerging that might also be performing these same kinds of revolutionary functions!
Molly