When: April 4, 2016
Where: MSU Writing Center
Victims: 6 Peer Tutors & 1 WC boss & 1
straggler (English Dept. Head)
At 4:30 pm the
rainclouds rolled into Bozeman, and as the first drops hit the pavement, I
trundled into the building, pulling my windblown hair from my face. The blustery
weather had dampened my plans; I wanted my targets primed and in a good mood,
but even something as subtle as outdoor conditions could affect how they
receive my spiel.
No matter; I
came prepared. Earlier that weekend I had taken the time to bake 48 individual
bribes cloaked in sugar and dark-chocolatey goodness. What exactly was I
bribing people to do? To come to my presentation on style, of course. The email
announcement—which included the mention of cookies—set the bait, and all I had
to do was follow through and cinch the deal. My training taught me well: “In
order to have goodwill…the rhetor has to understand the frame of mind of the
audience. When the rhetor assesses the audience and incorporates the
appropriate appeals, s/he appears to be motivated by the audience’s interests
and needs” (Palczewski 154). This basic concept is regularly practiced by
groups aiming to sucker college students into worthwhile activities; what
better universal appeal could you use besides that which is directed towards
the stomach?
Armed with
cookies, I felt confident I could lure some otherwise-reluctant people to
participate. Plus, I thought my cover was pretty decent: fellow tutor concerned
about cracking the code of dense, unclear writing. I even straightened my hair
and applied makeup that morning in the hopes of appearing semi-professional. And I had a secret plan.
Yup. The plan
was so secret, it wasn’t even written out—it was just all in my head. Okay, so
it wasn’t fully rehearsed either. This particular assignment presented a new
challenge for me: interacting with
the subjects rather than speaking from a memorized script. Those “cold” cases
are certainly easier to work with—less potential for messiness.
Didn’t some
famous guy say, “What can get messy, will get messy?” (Or you know—something along
those lines). Well, he was right. The most rehearsed part of my plan got messy.
Or rather, my subconscious decided to rebel and mess up my plan. See, I had scoped out the situation beforehand and
resolved not to lay all my cards on the table. If I revealed one of my primary
motives for the presentation—an assignment given me by one of my superiors—then
that information might not sit well with the audience.
I spilled the
beans; at least it was a good cop out from my original plan.
Interestingly,
the audience didn’t seem miffed at my divulgence. I figured, Well, I honestly told them that though the
assignment prompted me to action, I have been interested in the topic a long
time prior and felt it has been overlooked in WC discussions. Maybe they concluded
that genuine interest on the part of the rhetor, albeit with mixed motives, is
better than no genuine interest. Yet not only was the audience unperturbed,
they also weren’t distracted by the cookies. Huh. They weren’t such a tough
sell as I had thought they’d be. They didn’t need to be persuaded to listen to
me; they were already personally intrigued by a topic directly relevant to
their line of work. Then again, because I know these people, this shouldn’t
have surprised me…
You know how
some people have “light-bulb moments”? I think I had a strobe light epiphany. I
realized that I had underestimated/misunderstood my audience because I hadn’t
thought about them specifically going
into the assignment; instead, I resorted to my “public” writing mindset.
“[P]ublics are
different from persons, that the address of public rhetoric is never going to
be the same as address to actual persons,” writes Michael Warner (58). His
statement makes sense to me. My go-to writing mindset assumes a public audience; thus, I use all the ammunition available
to me to persuade even the most hardened (and unknown) audience member—although
obviously those homework assignments are rarely seen by more than two people.
Instead of
tailoring my presentation to specific people I knew would attend, I prepared to
meet the imaginary public in my mind, one that was less gracious than the
actual.
Once the smoke
cleared (since at this point the strobe light was scorched), I was able to
relax and allow the presentation take a more conversational turn. We discussed
the suggestions listed on the handouts (see the Evidence below) as well as
other techniques that individuals have used in sessions.
During the
conversation, I mentally jotted down two observations:
The exclusivity of the first observation notwithstanding, I thought these indicated signs of a good day's work. No crimes were committed or detected that day, but perhaps future (writing style) ones were averted.
Evidence
Evidence
No comments:
Post a Comment